ABSTRACT
Carbapenem administration is an important therapy for nosocomial infections due to MDRO, especially Acinetobacter baumannii. The global increase in carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) that causes this pathogen has significantly threatened public health due to the lack of adequate treatment options due to the very few currently available antimicrobial agents that actively fight CRAB. Antimicrobial resistance is a major negative impact of inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing. Ineffective empiric treatment (initial antibiotic regimen not sensitive to identified pathogens based on in vitro sensitivity test results) is associated with a higher rate of deaths compared to effective empiric treatment. In this study, we analyzed the correlation between the suitability of empiric and definitive antibiotics and the clinical outcomes of patients with bacteremia due to CRAB treated in the inpatient ward of Dr. Soetomo Tertiary Referral Hospital, Surabaya. There were 227 isolates of bacteremia due to CRAB, consisting of 156 carbapenem-resistant A. baumanni and 71 carbapenem-sensitive A. baumannii. There were 88 isolates that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and all of them were resistant to ceftriaxone, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin. A total of 29.5% of the isolates were sensitive to cotrimoxazole, 3.4% of the isolates were sensitive to tigecycline, and 2.3% of the isolates were sensitive to amikacin, levofloxacin, and cefoperazone sulbactam. Adequate empirical antibiotics and definitive antibiotics (sensitive based on culture sensitivity test) amounted to 12.5% and 27.3%, respectively. There is no significant correlation between the suitability of empiric and definitive therapies with the patients' clinical outcomes (death and length of stay).Copyright © 2022 Phcogj.Com.
ABSTRACT
Background: Improving basic infection control (IC) practices, diagnostics and anti-microbial stewardship (AMS) are key tools to handle antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Material(s) and Method(s): This is a retrospective study done over 6 years (2016-2021) in an oncology centre in North India with many on-going interventions to improve IC practices, diagnostics and AMS. This study looked into AMR patterns from clinical isolates, rates of hospital acquired infections (HAI) and clinical outcomes. Result(s): Over all, 98,915 samples were sent for culture from 158,191 admitted patients. Most commonly isolated organism was E. coli (n = 6951;30.1%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 5801;25.1%) and Pseudomonas aeroginosa (n = 3041;13.1%). VRE (Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus) rates fell down from 43.5% in Jan-June 2016 to 12.2% in July-Dec 2021, same was seen in CR (carbapenem resistant) Pseudomonas (23.0%-20.6%, CR Acinetobacter (66.6%-17.02%) and CR E. coli (21.6%-19.4%) over the same study period. Rate of isolation of Candida spp. from non-sterile sites also showed reduction (1.68 per 100 patients to 0.65 per 100 patients). Incidence of health care associated infections also fell from 2.3 to 1.19 per 1000 line days for CLABSI, 2.28 to 1.88 per 1000 catheter days for CAUTI. There was no change in overall mortality rates across the study period. Conclusion(s): This study emphasizes the point that improving compliance to standard IC recommendations and improving diagnostics can help in reducing the burden of antimicrobial resistance.Copyright © 2023 Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze the distribution and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture specimens of patients with bloodstream infections before and after COVID-19 (2018-2019 and 2020-2021), and to provide scientific basis and reference for rational treatment and effective control of bloodstream infections in the post-epidemic period. Methods: Blood culture specimens were collected from patients in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University in the two years before and after the COVID-19 outbreak (2018-2021). The Automated Blood Culture Systems were used to perform blood culture on blood specimens sent for clinical inspection, and the Vitek MS automatic bacterial identification mass spectrometer was used for strain identification and the Vitek 2 automatic bacterial drug susceptibility analyzer was used for drug susceptibility testing and drug resistance analysis. Results: Blood culture specimens were performed on 28 736 patients with suspected bloodstream infection submitted for inspection from January 2018 to December 2019, and a total of 2 181 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected after removing duplicate strains, with a positive rate of 7.69%, including 1 046 strains of Gram-negative bacteria, accounting for 47.96%. From January 2020 to December 2021, blood culture specimens from 26 083 patients with suspected bloodstream infection were submitted for inspection, and a total of 2 111 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected after excluding duplicate strains, with a positive rate of 8.09%, including 1 000 strains of Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 47.37%. The drug resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae was relatively serious, and the sensitivity rate to ertapenem, polymyxin B and tigecycline was more than 90%. The main non-fermentative bacteria Acinetobacter baumannii was more than 50% sensitive to piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin and polymyxin B. The sensitivity rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, piperacillin and meropenem were more than 50%. Conclusions: In the two years before and after COVID-19, there are many types of pathogenic bacteria in bloodstream infection, but the distribution do not differ significantly. The pathogens of bloodstream infection are mainly distributed in ICU, hepatobiliary research institute, and nephrology department. Among them, Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii are the main ones, and different pathogens showed great differences in drug resistance.
ABSTRACT
Objective. To assess level and the structure of systemic antibiotic consumption in Russia over the period 2017 to 2021. Materials and methods. Data were collected and analysed in compliance with the standard protocol of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe by the means of ATC/DDD methodology for J01 group - antibacterials for systemic use. Consumption was calculated for outpatients and inpatients separately as a number of DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID) for the main classes of antibiotics and the agents with the highest or the most diverse consumption levels for the given period of time, and was based on the data of wholesale purchases and public tenders. Results. Antibiotic consumption in Russia in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 was 16.6 DID, 14.3 DID, 14.8 DID, 19 DID, and 15.7 DID respectively. Penicillins, macrolides and lincosamides, and quinolones had the highest levels of consumption in outpatients. Prominent increase in outpatient consumption of antibacterials in 2020 was related to three agents: azithromycin, levofloxacin and ceftriaxone. Cephalosporins (mainly III-V generations), quinolones and penicillins had the highest levels of consumption in inpatients. Hospital consumption of meropenem, tigecycline, and vancomycin increased and amikacin and ciprofloxacin decreased over the duration of the study. Conclusions. Levels of systemic antibiotic consumption in Russia for the period 2017 to 2019 were relatively low and consistent with the average means for European Union and European Economic Area countries. The steep increase in consumption in 2020 was probably due to the wide use of antibiotics for the management of COVID-19 patients. The results of the study can be of value for the development of targeted national antibiotic stewardship programs and awareness campaigns as well as for the analysis of trends of emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance.Copyright © 2022, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objective. To review a literature published over the past 5 years and our own data on the etiology of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), antimicrobial resistance and its relationships between sepsis and choice of appropriate antibiotic therapy. Materials and methods. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) criteria were used to diagnose LRTI. A review of the articles regarding LRTI from the Russian and international English language journals published over 6 years was performed. Identification of microorganisms was performed by culture over the period of 2003-2013;since 2014, MALDI-TOF MS method was used for this purpose. Results. Despite the ongoing policy to limit the use of antimicrobial therapy in the ICUs, there is an increase in carbapenemase-producing isolates in the ICUs from 2.2% (2018) to 11.7% (2020, 9 months). Along with the trend to increase in carbapenemase-producing pathogens causing LRTI, their variability is also increasing. In particular, it applies to strains producing carbapenemases OXA-48 or combination of OXA- 48 with KPC;with the trend to combined production of carbapenemase beginning at 2019. Conclusions. Carbapenemase producers are becoming more widespread in the ICU settings, including the lower respiratory tract in mechanically ventilated patients. Practitioners didn't get used to associate VAP with the Sepsis-3 criteria. The changes in etiology include the increased rate of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria, primarily Acinetobacter spp., in Russia. It's due to improved quality of respiratory support and increased consumption of carbapenems, tigecycline and polymyxins. Significant increase of OXA-48-producing pathogens is likely to be associated with a poor compliance with temporary guidelines on COVID-19 with regard to antibiotic therapy.Copyright © 2021, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is the most detrimental pathogen that causes hospital-acquired infections. Tigecycline (TIG) is currently used as a potent antibiotic for treating CRAB infections; however, its overuse substantially induces the development of resistant isolates. Some molecular aspects of the resistance mechanisms of AB to TIG have been reported, but they are expected to be far more complicated and diverse than what has been characterized thus far. In this study, we identified bacterial extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are nano-sized lipid-bilayered spherical structures, as mediators of TIG resistance. Using laboratory-made TIG-resistant AB (TIG-R AB), we demonstrated that TIG-R AB produced more EVs than control TIG-susceptible AB (TIG-S AB). Transfer analysis of TIG-R AB-derived EVs treated with proteinase or DNase to recipient TIG-S AB showed that TIG-R EV proteins are major factors in TIG resistance transfer. Additional transfer spectrum analysis demonstrated that EV-mediated TIG resistance was selectively transferred to Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Proteus mirabilis. However, this action was not observed in Klebsiella pneumonia and Staphylococcus aureus. Finally, we showed that EVs are more likely to induce TIG resistance than antibiotics. Our data provide direct evidence that EVs are potent cell-derived components with a high, selective occurrence of TIG resistance in neighboring bacterial cells.
ABSTRACT
Maintaining reduction of a calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture is challenged by the powerful force exerted upon the bone fragment by the Achilles tendon. Low-demand, elderly patients with osteoporotic bone usually undergo a low-energy mechanism when this fracture pattern occurs. Likely attributable to poor bone quality, the rate of early fixation failure has been documented to be as high as 40%. We present the cases of two 65-year-old female patients who each sustained a calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture. Both patients underwent a low-energy mechanism of injury and had a medical history of many comorbidities. The first patient underwent a partial calcaneal ostectomy and tenotomy after failing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The second patient primarily underwent a partial calcaneal ostectomy and tenotomy. Postoperatively, after the incision site was fairly healed, both patients could bear weight as tolerated. This method of excision and release may allow for decreased risk of skin compromise and return trips to the operating room for failed ORIF. In low-demand patients with low-energy calcaneal avulsion type fractures and osteoporotic bone, this technique may be the preferred surgical option.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s)
ABSTRACT
Tigecycline (TGC), a third-generation tetracycline, is characterized by a more potent and broad antibacterial activity, and the ability to overcome different mechanisms of tetracycline resistance. TGC has proven to be of value in treatment of multidrug-resistant infections, but therapy can be complicated by multiple dangerous side effects, including direct drug toxicity. Given that, a TGC immunodetection method has been developed for therapeutic drug monitoring to improve the safety and efficacy of therapy. The developed indirect competitive ELISA utilized TGC selective antibodies and group-specific antibodies interacting with selected coating TGC conjugates. Both assay systems showed high sensitivity (IC50) of 0.23 and 1.59 ng/mL, and LOD of 0.02 and 0.05 ng/mL, respectively. Satisfactory TGC recovery from the spiked blood serum of healthy volunteers was obtained in both assays and laid in the range of 81-102%. TGC concentrations measured in sera from COVID-19 patients with secondary bacterial infections were mutually confirmed by ELISA based on the other antibody-antigen interaction and showed good agreement (R2 = 0.966). A TGC pharmacokinetic (PK) study conducted in three critically ill patients proved the suitability of the test to analyze the therapeutic concentrations of TGC. Significant inter-individual PK variability revealed in this limited group supports therapeutic monitoring of TGC in individual patients and application of the test for population pharmacokinetic modelling.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug Monitoring , Humans , Tigecycline/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies , Microbial Sensitivity TestsABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the rapid emergence of carbapenem and colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae has resulted in an alarming situation worldwide. We aimed to describe secondary infections and antimicrobial use, in a pregnant woman admitted to hospital with COVID-19. A 28-year-old pregnant woman was admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19. According to the clinical conditions, the patient was transferred to the ICU on the second day. She was empirically treated with ampicillin and clindamycin. Mechanical ventilation through an endotracheal tube was started on the 10th day. During her hospitalization in the ICU, she was infected with ESBL-producing K. pneumonia, Enterobacter spp and carbapenemase-producing colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Finally, the patient was treated with tigecycline monotherapy that was associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia clearance. Bacterial co-infection is relatively infrequent in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Treatment of infections caused by carbapenemase-producing colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates is challenging, with limited antimicrobials available in Iran. In order to prevent the spread of extensively drug-resistant bacteria, infection control programs must be implemented more seriously.
ABSTRACT
The study determined the etiological structure and sensitivity to antibacterial agents of pathogens of uncomplicated and complicated forms of pneumonia in children treated in a multidisciplinary hospital. According to the study, that timely bacteriological diagnosis in the treatment of pneumonia in childhood with an adequate selection of effective antibacterial agents helps reduce hospitalizations and the development of complicated forms of pneumonia.
ABSTRACT
CASE: An 81-year-old female with multiple co-morbidities including recent covid-19, presented to the emergency room with shortness of breath. On arrival, she was febrile with a temperature of 101F, pulse 100 beats/min, respiratory rate 14, blood pressure 196/163 and saturating at 75% on 10 L non-rebreather mask. Initial blood work showed WBC 10.9, lactic acid 1.7, BUN/creatinine 27/1.7 (consistent with her baseline), ABG showed pH 7.37, PCO2 49, PO2 88, HCO3 27.9. Chest x-ray demonstrated volume loss in the left hemithorax, airspace disease in the left mid lung and lung base. Due to suspicion for superimposed bacterial pneumonia and positive blood cultures for staphylococcus haemolyticus, she was started on vancomycin and azithromycin. Choice of antibiotics was challenging as she was allergic to penicillin and cephalosporins. During hospitalization, her kidney function deteriorated, vancomycin was substituted with tigecycline on day 3. Day 5 of treatment, she developed multiple episodes of vomiting with epigastric pain, lipase was 4523. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed with tigecycline presumed to be the inciting agent in the absence of other risk factors such as gall stones, chronic alcohol use, elevated triglycerides, previous known episodes of pancreatitis or any other causative medications. Tigecycline was switched back to vancomycin and she received aggressive IV fluid hydration which also improved her kidney function. Within 48 hours, the patient had improved oxygen saturation, resolution of her abdominal pain, and good oral intake marking significant overall clinical progress. She was discharged on home oxygen and few more days of IV vancomycin for bacteremia. IMPACT/DISCUSSION: Tigecycline is a broad-spectrum glycylcycline antimicrobial agent belonging to the tetracycline class of antibiotics. Tetracyclines have been associated with acute pancreatitis in literature, and concerns about tigecycline-induced acute pancreatitis have been raised over the past decade in post marketing surveys, we described one such case above. Using the Naranjo Adverse Drug reaction probability scale, a score of 6 was achieved, indicating that the patient's pancreatitis was probably related to tigecycline. CONCLUSION: We recommend physicians monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pancreatitis including abdominal pain after initiating treatment with tigecycline. There should be a low threshold for ordering lipase levels and abdominal CT imaging where indicated. If the patient has symptoms concerning for acute pancreatitis, consider stopping tigecycline and switching to a different class of antibiotics immediately.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Acinetobacter baumannii is an important causative agent of ventilation-associated pneumonia capable of long-term survival in the hospital setting. Increasing resistance to antibiotics effective against this pathogen is of concern. In this study, the antibiotic resistance profiles of A. baumannii strains grown in endotracheal aspirate (ETA) cultures in intensive care units and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the resistance profiles in our province where the highest number of cases were observed in our country for a long time were investigated. METHODS: Our study included 74 A. baumannii isolates isolated from ETA samples that was sent to our laboratory from the intensive care units of Bafra State Hospital between January 2019 and December 2020. Bacteria were identified using conventional methods and a semi automatic bacterial identification system Vitek-2 (bioMerieux, France). The antibiotic susceptibility tests of the isolated strains were studied in accordance with the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) standards. Antibiotic susceptibility of A. baumannii strains was tested with Vitek-2 system. RESULTS: The mean age and standard deviations of 18 patients before the COVID-19 pandemic and 56 patients after the pandemic were found to be 83.0 +or- 8.3 and 70.5 +or- 14.9 (p < 0.001), respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the distributions of gender by years (p=0.025). While 55.6% of the patients were female in 2019, 73.2% of the patients in 2020 were male. There was no difference between the two periods in terms of death rates (p=0.628) and respiratory support needs (p=0.191). It was determined that the pandemic increased the number of isolated A. baumannii by 311%. For the two periods, resistance was greatest for piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin and against imipenem. Examinig the two periods, amikacin resistance was seen to a lesser extent in 2020. A statistically significant difference was found between tigecycline resistance rates according to years (p < 0.001). While the tigecycline susceptibility of strains was 88.9% in 2019, it was found to be 26.8% in 2020.11.1% of the strains in 2019 and 64.3% in 2020 were found to be moderately susceptible. In this study, colistin resistance was observed in one (1.4%) of all isolates, while tigecycline resistance was detected in five isolates (6.8%). One isolate (1.4%) was susceptible to all antibiotics except ceftazidime. When the multi-antibiotic resistance of 73 A. baumannii isolates was examined, multidrug resistant (MDR) was 22.9% (n: 17), extensive drug resistance (XDR) was 74.3% (n: 55), pandrug resistance (PDR) was 1.4% (n: 1). Although there was a statistical difference in amikacin, meropenem and tigecycline resistances before and after the pandemic, no difference was found between the resistance patterns (p=0.281). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It has been observed that the most effective antibiotics against A. baumannii are colistin and tigecycline. It was determined that the COVID-19 pandemic did not change the resistance pattern rates. It is thought that success in fighting this infection will increase when each hospital determines its own resistance patterns, updates empirical treatment protocols based on their results, and clinicians use appropriate antibiotics early.
ABSTRACT
Background. One of the complications in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is a secondary bacterial infection. Its frequency can reach 15%, which makes it important to determine the etiology and antimicrobial resistance of the key pathogens responsible for the development of this pathology, in order to further improve the practice of prescribing and increase the effectiveness of antimicrobial chemotherapy. Aims — to assess the etiological structure and antibiotic resistance of the main pathogens of SBIs to improve the practice of antibiotic prescription. Methods. This retrospective study reviewed medical records of the patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the Moscow city hospital No. 4 between April 28 and November 1, 2020. Demographic, clinical outcomes, etiology, and antimicrobial resistance data of the SBIs were collected. Outcomes were also compared between patients who were classified as severe and critical on admission. Results. Among 3180 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 220 (6.9%) patients had acquired SBIs, and 50.0% of cases were fatal. The mean age was 72.7 ± 13.07 years. A higher mortality rate was observed in the group of critical patients (63%). 560 strains of bacteria isolated from the SBIs (58.8% isolated from lungs, 21% from urine and 20.2% from blood). 330 strains (58.9%) were Gram-negative bacteria. 109 patients had infections with mixed bacteria. 45 of them (20.5% of the total number of patients included in the study) had 2 pathogens, and 64 patients (29.1%) 3 or more strains. The top three bacteria of SBIs were A. baumannii (23.6%;132/560), K. pneumoniae (22.9%;128/560), and S. epidermidis (10.4%;58/560). The isolation rates of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii were 97%. Cefoperazone/sulbactam was the most active antibiotic against this pathogen with 62.1% sensitivity. Among K. pneumoniae strains, the level of resistance to carbapenems was 77.4% to meropenem and 54% to imipenem. The proportion of resistant strains to tigecycline and to colistin was 4 and 2.3% respectively. Meticillin resistance was present in 38.5% of S. aureus. 50% of E. faecium strains were vancomycinresistant. Conclusions. Gram-negative bacteria, especially A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae, were the main pathogens, and the resistance rates of the major isolated bacteria were generally high, which indicates that more accurate use of antibacterial agents is necessary for SBIs in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Background:Bacterial co-pathogens are commonly identified in viral respiratory tract infections such as influenza and are an im- portant cause of morbidity and mortality, necessitating timely diagnosis and antibacterial therapy1-3. The prevalence, incidence and characteristics of bacterial infection in patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS -CoV-2) is not well understood and has been raised as an important knowledge gap. Methods:This observational study was performed in the department of Microbiology, Tata memorial Hospital, Mumbai. All cancer patients admitted in ICU with COVID-19 for ≥48 hours between April 2020 to July 2020 were included in the study. Results:A total of 9595 cancer patients were tested for SARS Coronavirus 2 between April 2020 to July 2020 in the department of Microbiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai. Out of these 2380 (24.80%) were COVID- 19 positive. 30 (1.26%) of the patients tested positive for COVID 19 required ICU admission. Squamous cell carcinona (3), Pancreatic Cancer (3) and Breast Cancer (3) were most com- monly involved cancer types. 20/30 of these patients had bacterial super infections while 10/30 had co infections. NDBAL 22 (31.88%) constituted the major source of infection, followed by BILE 10 (14.49%), PUS, PUS SWAB & WOUND SWAB 9 (13.04%). Most common- ly isolated organisms was E. coli 20 (23.25%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 19 (22.09%), Acinetobacter spp. 15 (17.44%) and Klebseilla pneumoniae 14(16.27%) respec- tively. E. coli & K. pneumoniae were most commonly sensitive to Amikacin (63.63%) and Tigecycline (57.57%). Ps. aeruginosa was moderately sensitive to commonly used antibi- otics like Piperacillin – tazobactum, Ceftazidime, Cefoperazone sulbactam (42.85%) and Ciprofloxacin, Tobramycin (38.09%) [Formula presented] Conclusions:Understanding the proportion of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory bacterial co-infection, and the culprit pathogens, is crucial for treating patients with COVID- 19 and to help ensure responsible use of antibiotics and to minimize negative consequenc- es of overuse.